Humor, sorrow, and thrill are just a few words to describe
Michael Moore’s documentary “Bowling for Columbine.” Although he is a lifelong
member of the NRA he depicts the problems of owning a gun in America. Moore
weaves through cartoons, interviews, including one with NRA president Charlton
Heston, and heartfelt situations. Moore has bias views and believes the media
is to blame for this problem for focusing on crime thus leading to a greater
fear in the people, which prompts them to purchase guns. Although the
documentary is primarily set in the state of Colorado and the shooting at
Columbine High School, Moore travels to Canada where he realizes that the gun
to family ratio in Canada is the same to the US but has a far fewer death rate.
He also visits California where he asks an on duty Sergeant who he can arrest
for the pollution because the Hollywood sign isn’t visible from where he is
because of the smog. Moore’s appealing documentary has something interesting in
it for every viewer.
Moore’s engaging film locks in viewers with its
thought-provoking aspects. He visits two students who survived the Columbine
shooting, one whom has a bullet between his aorta and spine and the other whom
is now paralyzed from the bullet. The bullets the two students have inside them
still were purchased at K-mart so both students and Moore travel to K-mart
headquarters to ask them to stop selling bullets. They bring awareness to the
public about how easy it is to purchase a gun and bullets because they’re
available even at corner stores and there is no limit on how many one person
can purchase.
Some may say that jumping from topic to topic will shorten
an attention span but Moore integrates short clips throughout the documentary
keeping it interesting and laying out views and historical facts not commonly
known. They keep the documentary interesting throughout and help pick up speed
when parts begin to get dull (although there are very few, every film has
them). He uses clever techniques to get his point across although some are
taken out of context.
Moore uses humor to transform gun violence, a very serious
topic, into something relatable and amusing. He acts as if he is interested in
the speaker’s point of view and side of the story, portraying a way of
mock-seriousness. He depicts slimy techniques, tricking gun crazed NRA
activists to talk to him. He then asks them simple questions, which they are
unable to answer, but anyone else would supply a reasonable one. Extremists
interviewed deny that it in fact was the gun law, which was the issue and denied
that the gun law in the United States is outrageous. Michael Moore himself is
hilarious, and has a quirky smile while snappy witty comments towards the
unfortunate opposition.
I believe that the documentary was very well done. Moore
wasn’t afraid to find out the truth and get “down and dirty”. He uses his
journalism skills well and brings not only awareness but informs the issue of
guns to viewers. I would highly recommend this documentary as the general
public would greatly benefit from knowing more about guns and gun violence in
the world around them.